[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878uh8dvgl.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:39:22 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc: Chun-Yeow Yeoh <yeohchunyeow@...il.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>,
Yanbo Li <yanbol@....qualcomm.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: fixup wait_for_completion_timeout return handling
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at> writes:
> wait_for_completion_timeout does not return negative values so the tests
> for <= 0 are not needed and the case differentiation in the error handling
> path unnecessary.
>
> v2: all wait_for_completion_timeout changes in a single patch
> v3: patch formatting cleanups - no change of actual patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
> ---
> patch was only compile tested x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_ATH_CARDS=m
> CONFIG_ATH10K=m
>
> patch is against linux-next 3.19.0-rc1 -next-20141226
>
> None of the proposed cleanups are critical.
> All changes should only be removing unreachable cases.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough in my last email but everything related to
v2, v3 etc should be after "---" line. I fixed this in ath-next-test
branch and will apply your patch once kbuild has run it's tests.
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists