lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150112124537.GH4160@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:45:37 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
	Jiri Prchal <jiri.prchal@...ignal.cz>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Maxime Ripard

> > We do have one board where we have a pin (let's say GPIO14 of the bank
> > A) that enables a regulator that will provide VCC the bank B.

> I think it's a hog in this case though, not a GPIO regulator,
> definately not both. But let's check Mark's opinion on this.

I'm lacking some context here but my first thought is that if VCC might
be supplied by some other thing we need to use a regulator since
otherwise we can't substitute in the other regulator.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ