[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B3C3A0.6010708@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:52:48 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: tixy@...aro.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: checks kprobes_all_disarmed in unoptimized_kprobe().
(2015/01/12 21:09), Wang Nan wrote:
> Original code failed to disarm the probed instruction after
>
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>
> if OPTPROBE is enabled.
>
> This patch checks kprobes_all_disarmed in unoptimized_kprobe().
>
Looks good :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Thank you!
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 9471710..f16936b 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -630,6 +630,9 @@ static void unoptimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, bool force)
> {
> struct optimized_kprobe *op;
>
> + if (kprobes_all_disarmed)
> + return;
> +
> if (!kprobe_aggrprobe(p) || kprobe_disarmed(p))
> return; /* This is not an optprobe nor optimized */
>
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists