[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B3D899.5060204@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:22:17 +0200
From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
To: Sanjeev Sharma <sanjeev_sharma@...tor.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <peter.senna@...il.com>,
<shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: correct the bad expression while writing bit-pattern
On 1/12/2015 9:43 AM, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> This patch correct the bad expression while writing the
> bit-pattern from software's buffer to hardware registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <Sanjeev_Sharma@...tor.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c
> index 3e1a9c1..1ccca72 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar_ethtool.c
> @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ static int gfar_write_filer_table(struct gfar_private *priv,
> return -EBUSY;
>
> /* Fill regular entries */
> - for (; i < MAX_FILER_IDX - 1 && (tab->fe[i].ctrl | tab->fe[i].ctrl);
> + for (; i < MAX_FILER_IDX - 1 && ( i < tab->fe[i].ctrl);
> i++)
Why do you think 'i' can be compared with the 'ctrl' field?
Is the control field an index (provide proof if yes)? I doubt it...
Thanks,
Claudiu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists