linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv10 man-pages 5/5] execveat.2: initial man page for execveat(2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150112160721.GJ4574@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:07:21 -0500
From:	Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To:	David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 man-pages 5/5] execveat.2: initial man page for
 execveat(2)

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:33:49AM +0000, David Drysdale wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:17:41PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> writes:
> >>
> >> > I'm not proposing code because I'm a libc developer not a kernel
> >> > developer. I know what's needed for userspace to provide a conforming
> >> > fexecve to applications, not how to implement that on the kernel side,
> >> > although I'm trying to provide constructive ideas. The hostility is
> >> > really not necessary.
> >>
> >> Conforming to what?
> >>
> >> The open group fexecve says nothing about requiring a file descriptor
> >> passed to fexecve to have O_CLOEXEC.
> >
> > It doesn't require it but it allows it, and in multithreaded programs
> > that might run child processes (or library code that might be used in
> > such situations), O_CLOEXEC is mandatory everywhere to avoid fd leaks.
> 
> As a naive idea related to Andy's suggestion elsewhere, could you
> just have an environment convention for fexecve-ing scripts?  That
> would reduce FD leaks without any need for kernel involvement/changes.
> 
> For example, set _FEXECVED_VIA_FD=4 but don't set
> O_CLOEXEC before fexecve, and the interpreter reads then
> closes that FD.  Or just get the interpreter to spot scripts named
> "/dev/fd/%d" and read-then-close the FD that way, cf. Eric's suggestion
> at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/22/652.

No. Any omission of O_CLOEXEC even momentarily is a potentially
dangerous fd leak. This is the case whenever the process is
multithreaded and it's possible that other threads might fork and
exec. Think of the case of a privileged daemon re-execing itself (e.g.
to switch to an updated version) while there are potentially other
threads spawning non-privileged processes.

Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/