[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54B3F1EF.4060506@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:10:23 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, sakari.ailus@....fi,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 03/19] DT: leds: Add led-sources property
On 01/12/2015 02:52 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
> <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
>> On 01/09/2015 07:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
>>> <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add a property for defining the device outputs the LED
>>>> represented by the DT child node is connected to.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>>>> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
>>>> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
>>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>
>>>> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>> index a2c3f7a..29295bf 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
>>>> Common leds properties.
>>>>
>>>> Optional properties for child nodes:
>>>> +- led-sources : Array of bits signifying the LED current regulator
>>>> outputs the
>>>> + LED represented by the child node is connected to (1 -
>>>> the LED
>>>> + is connected to the output, 0 - the LED isn't connected
>>>> to the
>>>> + output).
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I just don't understand this.
>>
>>
>> In some Flash LED devices one LED can be connected to one or more
>> electric current outputs, which allows for multiplying the maximum
>> current allowed for the LED. Each sub-LED is represented by a child
>> node in the DT binding of the Flash LED device and it needs to declare
>> which outputs it is connected to. In the example below the led-sources
>> property is a two element array, which means that the flash LED device
>> has two current outputs, and the bits signify if the LED is connected
>> to the output.
>
> Sounds like a regulator for which we already have bindings for and we
> have a driver for regulator based LEDs (but no binding for it).
Do you think of drivers/leds/leds-regulator.c driver? This driver just
allows for registering an arbitrary regulator device as a LED subsystem
device.
There are however devices that don't fall into this category, i.e. they
have many outputs, that can be connected to a single LED or to many LEDs
and the driver has to know what is the actual arrangement.
> Please use the regulator binding.
>> Do your doubts stem from the ambiguity of the word "current" or the
>> form of the description itself is unclear? Probably there should be
>> explicit explanation added that the size of the array depends on the
>> number of current outputs of the flash LED device.
>
> The size of the array and meaning of array indexes was not clear.
What about this:
led-sources : Array of connection states between all LED current
sources exposed by the device and this LED (1 - this LED
is connected to the current output with index N, 0 -
this LED isn't connected to the current output with
index N); the mapping of N-th element of the array to the
physical device output should be defined in the LED
driver binding.
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists