[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1421085933-32536-113-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:03:49 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 112/216] drm/i915: Don't complain about stolen conflicts on gen3
3.16.7-ckt4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
commit 0b6d24c01932db99fc95304235e751e7f7625c41 upstream.
Apparently stuff works that way on those machines.
I agree with Chris' concern that this is a bit risky but imo worth a
shot in -next just for fun. Afaics all these machines have the pci
resources allocated like that by the BIOS, so I suspect that it's all
ok.
This regression goes back to
commit eaba1b8f3379b5d100bd146b9a41d28348bdfd09
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu Jul 4 12:28:35 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Verify that our stolen memory doesn't conflict
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76983
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71031
Tested-by: lu hua <huax.lu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 7465ab0fd396..936571622b43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -137,7 +137,11 @@ static unsigned long i915_stolen_to_physical(struct drm_device *dev)
r = devm_request_mem_region(dev->dev, base + 1,
dev_priv->gtt.stolen_size - 1,
"Graphics Stolen Memory");
- if (r == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * GEN3 firmware likes to smash pci bridges into the stolen
+ * range. Apparently this works.
+ */
+ if (r == NULL && !IS_GEN3(dev)) {
DRM_ERROR("conflict detected with stolen region: [0x%08x - 0x%08x]\n",
base, base + (uint32_t)dev_priv->gtt.stolen_size);
base = 0;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists