[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150112204200.4ffefdd4@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:42:00 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: <balbi@...com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:26 -0600
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600
> > Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> > > > "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> > > > this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> > >
> > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > > #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827:
> > > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" },
> > >
> > > WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > > #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828:
> > > + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" },
> > >
> > > please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas'
> > > Acked-by since he's already given it ?
> >
> > Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch
> > (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.
>
> heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad.
>
You took v3 of the first patch instead of v4.
Don't know if you can replace it (anyway, that's not such a big deal
since the only change is the commit message)...
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists