[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B4D8CE.3070503@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:35:26 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/compaction: add tracepoint to observe behaviour
of compaction defer
On 01/13/2015 08:18 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:35:47PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Hm what if we avoided dirtying the cache line in the non-deferred case? Would be
>> simpler, too?
>>
>> if (zone->compact_considered + 1 >= defer_limit)
>> return false;
>>
>> zone->compact_considered++;
>>
>> trace_mm_compaction_defer_compaction(zone, order);
>>
>> return true;
>
> Okay. I will include this minor optimization in next version of this
> patch.
Hm, on second thought, the "+ 1" part would break compaction_restarting() and
it's ugly anyway. Removing "+ 1" would increase the number of
compaction_deferred() attempts until success by one. Which should be negligible,
but maybe not good to hide it in a tracepoint patch. Sorry for the noise.
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists