linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: mediatek: Add driver for Mediatek I2C controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150113095725.GC1059@katana>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:57:26 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc:	Liguo Zhang <Liguo.Zhang@...iatek.com>,
	Xudong Chen <xudong.chen@...iatek.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	YH Chen <yh.chen@...iatek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Nathan Chung <nathan.chung@...iatek.com>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: mediatek: Add driver for Mediatek I2C
 controller

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > We've started upstream work for MT8173[1].
> > 
> > We've fixed these issues for new SoC, and we believe it is fully I2C
> > compatible now. We'll add mt8173 support to this driver, so this driver
> > will support both fully I2C compatible SoC and the current one.
> 
> From what you tell, I'd rather add the MT8173 support incrementally.
> Let's get first the limited support properly implemented, then add
> another controller.
> 
> I'll send out my draft for describing the quirks later today.

What do you think about my two proposals?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)