linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501131215380.5526@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:17:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before
 poking RCU

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Calvin Owens wrote:
> On Wednesday 01/07 at 20:53 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Should this go to stable as well? It is technically a regression, albeit
> > > a rather long-standing one.
> > 
> > Your original patch could go into stable, but my updated version depends
> > on functionality not present before 3.20.
> 
> Right. I'll wait until 3.20-rc1, and then I'll send the original to
> stable with a reference to the commit.

We better do that in two steps:

   1) The original patch tagged for stable
   2) Pauls version as a delta patch

Can one of you please provide such a series?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/