[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113113538.GB7660@katana>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:35:38 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
soren.brinkmann@...inx.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
harinikatakamlinux@...il.com, Vishnu Motghare <vishnum@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] i2c: cadence: Check for errata condition
involving master receive
> @@ -541,6 +541,18 @@ static int cdns_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
> * processed with a repeated start.
> */
> if (num > 1) {
> + /*
> + * This controller does not give completion interrupt after a
> + * master receive transfer if HOLD bit is set (repeated start),
> + * resulting in SW timeout. Hence, if a receive transfer is
> + * followed by any other transfer, an error is returned
> + * indicating that this sequence is not supported.
> + */
> + for (count = 0; count < num-1; count++) {
> + if (msgs[count].flags & I2C_M_RD)
> + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent, "No support for repeated start when receive is followed by a transfer\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> id->bus_hold_flag = 1;
> reg = cdns_i2c_readreg(CDNS_I2C_CR_OFFSET);
> reg |= CDNS_I2C_CR_HOLD;
Have you ever tested this code? There is a huge bug in it :(
Also, in the comment, use "message" instead of "transfer". One transfer
consists of multiple messages.
Maybe the warning can be simplified, too: "can't do repeated start after
read messages".
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists