[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcO8Tm5A0101SjTGZVk-ku_ZEOzMpOz3NgqxXT=U7meOtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:07:12 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce push/pop macros which generate
CFI_REL_OFFSET and CFI_RESTORE
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> I think I prefer the somewhat less magical:
>
> pushq_reg_cfi %r11 /* saves r11 */
> pushq_reg_cfi %r11, savereg=rip /* saves rip */
> pushq_nounwind_cfi $0
>
> Or something like that.
That's very close to my patch. With it:
pushq_cfi - doesn't emit "register is saved" annotation, can be
used with non-register args.
pushq_cfi_reg - emits it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists