linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp: Fix RFC reference in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABrhC0m=aPO=OcfK_gTusHz7CU9OUeXAHoqUDaVTGLDiQnL56Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:01:28 -0500
From:	John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
To:	"Banerjee, Debabrata" <dbanerje@...mai.com>
Cc:	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Fix RFC reference in comment

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Banerjee, Debabrata
<dbanerje@...mai.com> wrote:
> On 1/13/15, 4:36 PM, "Yuchung Cheng" <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@...mai.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> -/* RFC2861. Reset CWND after idle period longer RTO to "restart
>>>window".
>>> +/* RFC2581 4.1. Reset CWND after idle period longer RTO to "restart
>>>window".
>>>   * This is the first part of cwnd validation mechanism. */
>>>  static void tcp_cwnd_restart(struct sock *sk, const struct dst_entry
>>>*dst)
>>>  {
>>
>>RFC2861 resets the cwnd like in RFC2581, but the rest of the code
>>implements RFC2861. So I think the current comment is fine.
>
>
> No RFC2861 is an experimental RFC that's implemented in
> tcp_cwnd_application_limited(). RFC2861 Recommends reducing the cwnd by
> averaging the current cwnd and the used cwnd as the new cwnd.
>
>
> RFC2581 4.1 Says to set cwnd to initial cwnd if more than one rto has
> passed since the last send. This is what is implemented in the function
> above.

Look at the code a little closer -- it's decaying cwnd based on number
of timeouts as described in 2861, not resetting to IW as recommended
in 2581.

  -John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/