linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hostfs: Use noop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:19:58 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, dxld@...kboxed.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hostfs: Use noop_fsync for directories

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:15:58PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Daniel reported that dpkg(1) dies if the root filesystem is a hostfs
> because it does not expect fsync(2) to fail with EINVAL on directories.
> While fsync(2) is allowed to fail with EINVAL if the filesystem does not
> support it we can do better and use noop_fsync() to not confuse userspace
> further.

Shouldn't hostfs pass the fsync through to the host filesystem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/