[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113225021.GG3843@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:50:21 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: at91/dt: add SRAM nodes
Hi,
On 13/01/2015 at 19:12:24 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi
> index 72424371413e..c055da2f151f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rl.dtsi
> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@
> };
> };
>
> + sram: sram@...00000 {
> + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> + reg = <0x00300000 0x4000>;
> + };
> +
Actually, I'm not sure about the sam9rl. The previous code was doing:
switch (at91_soc_initdata.cidr & AT91_CIDR_SRAMSIZ) {
case AT91_CIDR_SRAMSIZ_32K:
sram_size = 2 * SZ_16K;
break;
case AT91_CIDR_SRAMSIZ_16K:
default:
sram_size = SZ_16K;
}
So the SRAM size should be 16k or 32k but what I get from the only cidr
registered for sam9rl (0x019b03a0, also from the datasheet) is SRAMSIZ=
0xb which give 64k. Could you confirm?
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists