lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:47:59 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	ARM Maintainers <arm@...nel.org>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries

Hi Olof,

On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
> > options may be removed in the near future.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> > ---
> > Hi Olof,
> > 
> > This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
> > If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
> > don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
> > arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
> 

You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.

That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
per SoC.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ