[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B6FF75.70500@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:44:53 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add support for reset for apq8064
On 01/14/2015 03:38 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Pramod Gurav
> <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com> wrote:
>> +static void msm_pinctrl_setup_pm_reset(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
>> +{
>> + int i = 0;
>> + const struct msm_function *func = pctrl->soc->functions;
>> +
>> + for (; i <= pctrl->soc->nfunctions; i++)
> Shouldn't this be
>
> i < pctrl->soc->nfunctions
>
> As it stands, if nfunctions == 0, this function crashes.
>
I think so. Can you send a patch? Plus it would be nice to move i = 0 in
the for loop at the same time.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists