[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150113164726.72ab8dec58aabf332fd4e1a0@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:47:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Maximilian Attems <max@...o.at>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] headers_check: don't warn about kexec.h
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:05:11 +0100 Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> [Dragging Andrew, Linus, and Maximilian into this thread.]
>
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 21:27 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 January 2015 18:13:32 Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > The last time that Geoff has been trying to get that patch applied
> > > should be
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b0702fc4186db21820d686e89afd6480560823db.1415837218.git.geoff@infradead.org>
> > > I'd rather see that go in.
> >
> > Fine with me as well. As long as we can find someone to take one of
> > the patches, I'm happy.
>
> Since Geoff's patch (and my preceding, identical patch) basically is a
> partial revert of commit 29a5c67e7a78 ("kexec: export kexec.h to user
> space") that should probably be done by either Andrew or Linus.
>
> (This short thread starts at
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/12825174.7oxZXDxNhV@wuerfel .)
hm, sorry, I can't imagine why I didn't process Geoff's patch series
back in November. They all look good - I grabbed them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists