lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:12:40 +0800
From:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<mingo@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	xiakaixu 00238161 <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Move enabling tracepoints to just after
 rcu_init()

Ping...

On 2015/1/9 12:06, Wang Nan wrote:
> Hi Steven Rostedt,
> 
> During studying your code we find a problem, please see below.
> 
>>
>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>
>> Enabling tracepoints at boot up can be very useful. The tracepoint
>> can be initialized right after RCU has been. There's no need to
>> wait for the early_initcall() to be called. That's too late for some
>> things that can use tracepoints for debugging. Move the logic to
>> enable tracepoints out of the initcalls and into init/main.c to
>> right after rcu_init().
>>
>> This also allows trace_printk() to be used early too.
>>
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1412121539300.16494@nanos
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141214164104.307127356@goodmis.org
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +void __init trace_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	tracer_alloc_buffers();
>> +	init_ftrace_syscalls();
>> +	trace_event_init();	
>> +}
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +
>> +void __init trace_event_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	event_trace_memsetup();
>> +	init_ftrace_syscalls();
>> +	event_trace_enable();
>> +}
>> +
> 
> init_ftrace_syscalls() get called twice by trace_init() and trace_event_init(), some resources are wasted.
> At lease one of them can be removed.
> 
> In addition, could you please have a look at my early kprobe patch series?
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313835.html
> 
> Which enables kprobe very early, even before memory initialized. I think it is possible to combine these
> early tracing facilities together.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ