linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 050/150] blk-mq: Fix uninitialized kobject at CPU hotplugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150114072058.150474270@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:22:01 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 050/150] blk-mq: Fix uninitialized kobject at CPU hotplugging

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>

commit 06a41a99d13d8e919e9a00a4849e6b85ae492592 upstream.

When a CPU is hotplugged, the current blk-mq spews a warning like:

  kobject '(null)' (ffffe8ffffc8b5d8): tried to add an uninitialized object, something is seriously wrong.
  CPU: 1 PID: 1386 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 3.18.0-rc7-2.g088d59b-default #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_171129-lamiak 04/01/2014
   0000000000000000 0000000000000002 ffffffff81605f07 ffffe8ffffc8b5d8
   ffffffff8132c7a0 ffff88023341d370 0000000000000020 ffff8800bb05bd58
   ffff8800bb05bd08 000000000000a0a0 000000003f441940 0000000000000007
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff81005306>] dump_trace+0x86/0x330
   [<ffffffff81005644>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x94/0x170
   [<ffffffff81006d21>] show_stack+0x21/0x50
   [<ffffffff81605f07>] dump_stack+0x41/0x51
   [<ffffffff8132c7a0>] kobject_add+0xa0/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8130aee1>] blk_mq_register_hctx+0x91/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8130b82e>] blk_mq_sysfs_register+0x3e/0x60
   [<ffffffff81309298>] blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify+0xf8/0x190
   [<ffffffff8107cfdc>] notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x70
   [<ffffffff8105fd23>] cpu_notify+0x23/0x50
   [<ffffffff81060037>] _cpu_up+0x157/0x170
   [<ffffffff810600d9>] cpu_up+0x89/0xb0
   [<ffffffff815fa5b5>] cpu_subsys_online+0x35/0x80
   [<ffffffff814323cd>] device_online+0x5d/0xa0
   [<ffffffff81432485>] online_store+0x75/0x80
   [<ffffffff81236a5a>] kernfs_fop_write+0xda/0x150
   [<ffffffff811c5532>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1f0
   [<ffffffff811c5f42>] SyS_write+0x42/0xb0
   [<ffffffff8160c4ed>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
   [<00007f0132fb24e0>] 0x7f0132fb24e0

This is indeed because of an uninitialized kobject for blk_mq_ctx.
The blk_mq_ctx kobjects are initialized in blk_mq_sysfs_init(), but it
goes loop over hctx_for_each_ctx(), i.e. it initializes only for
online CPUs.  Thus, when a CPU is hotplugged, the ctx for the newly
onlined CPU is registered without initialization.

This patch fixes the issue by initializing the all ctx kobjects
belonging to each queue.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908794
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-mq-sysfs.c |    9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
@@ -390,16 +390,15 @@ static void blk_mq_sysfs_init(struct req
 {
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
-	int i, j;
+	int i;
 
 	kobject_init(&q->mq_kobj, &blk_mq_ktype);
 
-	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
+	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)
 		kobject_init(&hctx->kobj, &blk_mq_hw_ktype);
 
-		hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, j)
-			kobject_init(&ctx->kobj, &blk_mq_ctx_ktype);
-	}
+	queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i)
+		kobject_init(&ctx->kobj, &blk_mq_ctx_ktype);
 }
 
 /* see blk_register_queue() */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/