[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1421250356-16690-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:45:56 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH] of: Add missing of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path()
When traversing all nodes and moving to a new path component, the old
one must be released by calling of_node_put(). Else the refcounts of the
parent node(s) will not be decremented.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
Background.
While investigating a reference count imbalance issue with
CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC=y, I wrote the debug code below to validate the
reference counts of the nodes I was interested in.
During the first call of check_refcnts(), it gathers all reference
counts. During a subsequent call, it verifies that they are still the
same.
Surprisingly, lots of reference counts were wrong, and kept incrementing
every time check_refcnts() was called.
I was just wondering whether it would be useful to have a reference
count test in OF_UNITTEST, but now I see the "select OF_DYNAMIC" will go
away?
Feel free to (ab)use the code below and derive a unittest from it...
static struct to_check {
const char *path;
int refcnt;
} to_check[] = {
{ "/" },
{ "/cpus/cpu@0" },
{ "/cpus/cpu@1" },
/* ... other paths I was interested in ... */
};
static void check_refcnts(void)
{
static bool called;
unsigned int i;
const char *path;
struct device_node *np;
int refcnt;
unsigned int errors = 0;
pr_info("----- %s reference counts -----\n",
called ? "Checking" : "Saving");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(to_check); i++) {
path = to_check[i].path;
np = of_find_node_by_path(path);
if (!np)
continue;
refcnt = atomic_read(&np->kobj.kref.refcount);
if (!called) {
pr_info("%s %d\n", path, refcnt);
to_check[i].refcnt = refcnt;
} else if (refcnt == to_check[i].refcnt) {
pr_info("%s %d (OK)\n", path, refcnt);
} else {
pr_info("%s %d (should be %d)\n", path, refcnt,
to_check[i].refcnt);
errors++;
}
of_node_put(np);
}
if (called)
pr_info("----- Checking done (%u errors) -----\n", errors);
else
pr_info("----- Saving done -----\n");
called = true;
}
---
drivers/of/base.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 36536b6a8834acd2..f3e346e19c69d1f2 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -791,8 +791,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_opts_by_path(const char *path, const char **opt
if (!np)
np = of_node_get(of_root);
while (np && *path == '/') {
+ struct device_node *parent = np;
path++; /* Increment past '/' delimiter */
- np = __of_find_node_by_path(np, path);
+ np = __of_find_node_by_path(parent, path);
+ of_node_put(parent);
path = strchrnul(path, '/');
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists