lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B69072.4080607@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:51:14 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC:	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, kgene@...nel.org,
	inki.dae@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] clocksource: exynos_mct: Add the support for
 Exynos 64bit SoC

On 01/14/15 14:33, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

Hi,

+ Doug, Olof

> This patch adds the support for Exynos 64bit SoC. The delay_timer is only used
> for Exynos 32bit SoC.
> 
Yes, the Exynos MCT(Multi-Core Timer) is 64bit timer and it is available
on 64bit exynos SoC such as exynos7. But basically ARMv8 architecture is
including ARM ARCH timer (ARM Generic Timer) and exynos7 also has
implemented it and additionally its access is faster than using memory
mapped register called SFR for MCT...so Doug submitted patch to use MCT
on 32bit exynos SoCs before.

I know using MCT on 64bit exynos is usefulness for Power Management and
I need to talk to relevant guys in office again. If anything, I'll let
you know.

Thanks,
Kukjin

> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
> This patch set is tested on 64-bit Exynos SoC. I send only this patch from
> following patchst[1].
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/134
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - None
> Changes from v1:
> - Use CONFIG_ARM instead of CONFIG_ARM64
> 
>  drivers/clocksource/Kconfig      | 1 -
>  drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> index fc01ec2..be38119 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> @@ -135,7 +135,6 @@ config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC
>  
>  config CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT
>  	def_bool y if ARCH_EXYNOS
> -	depends on !ARM64
>  	help
>  	  Support for Multi Core Timer controller on Exynos SoCs.
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> index 9403061..b840ea1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void)
>  	return exynos4_read_count_32();
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
>  static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer;
>  
>  static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
> @@ -231,14 +232,17 @@ static cycles_t exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
>  			 "cycles_t needs to move to 32-bit for ARM64 usage");
>  	return exynos4_read_count_32();
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void)
>  {
>  	exynos4_mct_frc_start();
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
>  	exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer;
>  	exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate;
>  	register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer);
> +#endif
>  
>  	if (clocksource_register_hz(&mct_frc, clk_rate))
>  		panic("%s: can't register clocksource\n", mct_frc.name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ