[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150114163800.GZ12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:38:00 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
'Will Deacon' <will.deacon@....com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'akinobu.mita@...il.com'" <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC V6 2/3] arm:add bitrev.h file to support rbit instruction
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 08:40:56PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> Oh, I see,
> How about change like this:
> + select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if ((CPU_V7M || CPU_V7) && !CPU_V6 && !CPU_V6K)
> I am not sure if I also need add some older CPU types like !CPU_ARM9TDMI && !CPU_ARM940T ?
>
> Another solution is:
> + select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if ((CPU_32V7M || CPU_32V7) && !CPU_32V6 && !CPU_32V5 && !CPU_32V4 && !CPU_32V4T && !CPU_32V3)
>
> By the way, I am not clear about the difference between CPU_V6 and CPU_V6K, could you tell me? :)
I think
select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE if (CPU_32v7M || CPU_32v7) && !CPU_32v6
is sufficient - we don't support mixing pre-v6 and v6+ CPU architectures
into a single kernel.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists