linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/12] usb: gadget: at91

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150114183516.GN3843@piout.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:35:16 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] usb: gadget: at91_udc: Remove non-DT handling code

On 14/01/2015 at 11:38:12 -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote :
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:22:00PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > 
> > Since non-DT board support has been removed from the at91 architecture we
> > can safely remove non-DT handling code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig    |  1 +
> >  drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c | 16 ++--------------
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > index b8e213eb36cc..366e551aeff0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ menu "USB Peripheral Controller"
> >  config USB_AT91
> >  	tristate "Atmel AT91 USB Device Port"
> >  	depends on ARCH_AT91
> > +	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> will this build with !OF builds ?
> 

It should, I'll check but it doesn't matter because it depends on
ARCH_AT91 which selects OF.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/