[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150114055701.GX2481@sapphire.tkos.co.il>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:57:01 +0200
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: digicolor: fix sysrq handling
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:37:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Trying to build the digicolor-usart driver when sysrq is disabled
> results in a compile error:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c: In function 'digicolor_uart_console_write':
> drivers/tty/serial/digicolor-usart.c:407:33: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member named 'sysrq'
>
> Like a lot of other drivers, this one requires an #ifdef to avoid
> accessing the sysrq field here. While looking into this, I noticed
> that the case where sysrq support is enabled is also broken, because
> the driver fails to set the SUPPORT_SYSRQ macro.
>
> This patch hopefully fixes both, but I do not hardware to test if sysrq
> is actually working now.
Unfortunately the hardware is not able to detect the BREAK condition, so it is
not possible to support sysrq on this hardware. I'll send a patch removing
sysrq reference.
Thanks for build testing and reporting.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists