lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:37:53 +0300
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm v2] vmscan: move reclaim_state handling to shrink_slab

current->reclaim_state is only used to count the number of slab pages
reclaimed by shrink_slab(). So instead of initializing it before we are
going to call try_to_free_pages() or shrink_zone(), let's set in
directly in shrink_slab().

Note that after this patch try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() will count not
only reclaimed user pages, but also slab pages, which is expected,
because it can reclaim kmem from kmem-active sub cgroups.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - do not change shrink_slab() return value to the number of reclaimed
   slab pages, because it can make drop_slab() abort beforehand (Andrew)

 mm/page_alloc.c |    4 ----
 mm/vmscan.c     |   43 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e1963ea0684a..f528e4ba91b5 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2448,7 +2448,6 @@ static int
 __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 		  nodemask_t *nodemask)
 {
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
 	int progress;
 
 	cond_resched();
@@ -2457,12 +2456,9 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
 	cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
 	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
-	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
-	current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
 	progress = try_to_free_pages(zonelist, order, gfp_mask, nodemask);
 
-	current->reclaim_state = NULL;
 	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
 	current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 16f3e45742d6..26fdcc6c747d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -367,13 +367,18 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
  * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
  * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
  *
- * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
+ * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects. The number of reclaimed slab
+ * pages is added to *@..._nr_reclaimed.
  */
 static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 				 struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				 unsigned long nr_scanned,
-				 unsigned long nr_eligible)
+				 unsigned long nr_eligible,
+				 unsigned long *ret_nr_reclaimed)
 {
+	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
+		.reclaimed_slab = 0,
+	};
 	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
 
@@ -394,6 +399,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
+
 	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
 		struct shrink_control sc = {
 			.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
@@ -410,6 +417,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 		freed += do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
 	}
 
+	current->reclaim_state = NULL;
+	*ret_nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
+
 	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
 out:
 	cond_resched();
@@ -419,6 +429,7 @@ out:
 void drop_slab_node(int nid)
 {
 	unsigned long freed;
+	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
 
 	do {
 		struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
@@ -426,9 +437,9 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
 		freed = 0;
 		do {
 			freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
-					     1000, 1000);
+					     1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
 		} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
-	} while (freed > 10);
+	} while (freed);
 }
 
 void drop_slab(void)
@@ -2339,7 +2350,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
 static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			bool is_classzone)
 {
-	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
 	bool reclaimable = false;
 
@@ -2371,7 +2381,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 			if (memcg && is_classzone)
 				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
 					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
-					    lru_pages);
+					    lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
 
 			/*
 			 * Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
@@ -2398,12 +2408,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
 		if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
 			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
 				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
-				    zone_lru_pages);
-
-		if (reclaim_state) {
-			sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
-			reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
-		}
+				    zone_lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
 
 		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
 			   sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
@@ -3367,17 +3372,12 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
 	int balanced_classzone_idx;
 	pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t*)p;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
-		.reclaimed_slab = 0,
-	};
 	const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
 
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
 		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask);
-	current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tell the memory management that we're a "memory allocator",
@@ -3449,7 +3449,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
 	}
 
 	tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD);
-	current->reclaim_state = NULL;
 	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
 
 	return 0;
@@ -3492,7 +3491,6 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
  */
 unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
 {
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
@@ -3508,12 +3506,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
 
 	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
-	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
-	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
 	nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
 
-	p->reclaim_state = NULL;
 	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
 	p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
 
@@ -3678,7 +3673,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 	/* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
 	const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
 	struct task_struct *p = current;
-	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
 		.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
@@ -3697,8 +3691,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 	 */
 	p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
 	lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
-	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
-	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
 	if (zone_pagecache_reclaimable(zone) > zone->min_unmapped_pages) {
 		/*
@@ -3710,7 +3702,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		} while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
 	}
 
-	p->reclaim_state = NULL;
 	current->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE);
 	lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
 	return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ