linux-kernel - [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix bindings document

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1421311960-4120-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:52:40 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
To:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix bindings document

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
index b9bd1d6..f7a158d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
 ----------------------------------
 
 A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active-
-high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed:
+high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be
+followed:
 
 The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the
 GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted
@@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows:
 	numeric-gpio-range ::=
 			<pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count>
 	named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>'
-	gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node.
+	pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node
 	gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller
 	pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller
 	count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/