[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2648963.rfs1ehcxce@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:45:05 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PCI / PM: Avoid resuming PCI devices during system suspend
On Monday, January 12, 2015 11:39:18 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:51:06 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Commit f25c0ae2b4c4 (ACPI / PM: Avoid resuming devices in ACPI PM
> > > > domain during system suspend) modified the ACPI PM domain's system
> > > > suspend callbacks to allow devices attached to it to be left in the
> > > > runtime-suspended state during system suspend so as to optimize
> > > > the suspend process.
> > > >
> > > > This was based on the general mechanism introduced by commit
> > > > aae4518b3124 (PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended
> > > > devices unnecessarily).
> > > >
> > > > Extend that approach to PCI devices by modifying the PCI bus type's
> > > > ->prepare callback to return 1 for devices that are runtime-suspended
> > > > when it is being executed and that are in a suitable power state and
> > > > need not be resumed going forward.
> > >
> > > Does this correctly handle PCI devices that aren't included in the ACPI
> > > tables? For example, add-on PCI cards?
> >
> > Well, it would if it took the case when a device was configured for remote
> > wakeup at run time but was not supposed to wakeup the system from sleep into
> > account.
> >
> > That needs to be checked in pci_dev_keep_suspended() rather than in the platform
> > callback to cover all devices.
> >
> > Updated patch follows.
> >
> > Rafael
>
> This looks better, thank you.
Well, it still has the problem that the current ACPI wakeup setting may not be
suitable depending on the PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP value which I overlooked
before.
I need to restore the check against adev->wakeup.prepare_count in
acpi_pci_need_resume() to cover that I think.
Will post a v2 with that fixed.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists