[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B79F5F.1040806@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:07:11 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/8] x86/xen/p2m: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with
READ_ONCE
Am 15.01.2015 um 11:43 schrieb David Vrabel:
> On 15/01/15 08:58, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
>> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
>> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
>>
>> Change the p2m code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
>
> Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Thanks
> Let me know if you want me to merge this via the Xen tree.
With your Acked-by, I can easily carry this in my tree. We can
then ensure that this patch is merged before the ACCESS_ONCE is
made stricter - making bisecting easier.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists