| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:43:56 +0800
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
To: "'Vladimir Davydov'" <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, "'Rik van Riel'" <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2] vmscan: move reclaim_state handling to shrink_slab
> current->reclaim_state is only used to count the number of slab pages
> reclaimed by shrink_slab(). So instead of initializing it before we are
> going to call try_to_free_pages() or shrink_zone(), let's set in
> directly in shrink_slab().
>
> Note that after this patch try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() will count not
> only reclaimed user pages, but also slab pages, which is expected,
> because it can reclaim kmem from kmem-active sub cgroups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
> Changes in v2:
> - do not change shrink_slab() return value to the number of reclaimed
> slab pages, because it can make drop_slab() abort beforehand (Andrew)
>
> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ----
> mm/vmscan.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e1963ea0684a..f528e4ba91b5 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2448,7 +2448,6 @@ static int
> __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> - struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> int progress;
>
> cond_resched();
> @@ -2457,12 +2456,9 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, struct zonelist *zonelist,
> cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
> current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
> - reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
> - current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
>
> progress = try_to_free_pages(zonelist, order, gfp_mask, nodemask);
>
> - current->reclaim_state = NULL;
> lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 16f3e45742d6..26fdcc6c747d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -367,13 +367,18 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
> * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
> *
> - * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
> + * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects. The number of reclaimed slab
> + * pages is added to *@..._nr_reclaimed.
> */
> static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long nr_scanned,
> - unsigned long nr_eligible)
> + unsigned long nr_eligible,
> + unsigned long *ret_nr_reclaimed)
> {
> + struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
> + .reclaimed_slab = 0,
> + };
> struct shrinker *shrinker;
> unsigned long freed = 0;
>
> @@ -394,6 +399,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> +
> list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
> struct shrink_control sc = {
> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> @@ -410,6 +417,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> freed += do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
> }
>
> + current->reclaim_state = NULL;
> + *ret_nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
> +
> up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> out:
> cond_resched();
> @@ -419,6 +429,7 @@ out:
> void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> {
> unsigned long freed;
> + unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
>
> do {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> @@ -426,9 +437,9 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> freed = 0;
> do {
> freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
> - 1000, 1000);
> + 1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
> } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> - } while (freed > 10);
> + } while (freed);
> }
>
> void drop_slab(void)
> @@ -2339,7 +2350,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
> static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> bool is_classzone)
> {
> - struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> bool reclaimable = false;
>
> @@ -2371,7 +2381,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> if (memcg && is_classzone)
> shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
> memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> - lru_pages);
> + lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
>
> /*
> * Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
> @@ -2398,12 +2408,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
> shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
> sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> - zone_lru_pages);
> -
> - if (reclaim_state) {
> - sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> - reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> - }
> + zone_lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
>
> vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> @@ -3367,17 +3372,12 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
> int balanced_classzone_idx;
> pg_data_t *pgdat = (pg_data_t*)p;
> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> -
> - struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
> - .reclaimed_slab = 0,
> - };
> const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of_node(pgdat->node_id);
>
> lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, cpumask);
> - current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
>
> /*
> * Tell the memory management that we're a "memory allocator",
> @@ -3449,7 +3449,6 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
> }
>
> tsk->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_KSWAPD);
> - current->reclaim_state = NULL;
> lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
>
> return 0;
> @@ -3492,7 +3491,6 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
> */
> unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
> {
> - struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
> .gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> @@ -3508,12 +3506,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
>
> p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(sc.gfp_mask);
> - reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
> - p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
>
> nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages(zonelist, &sc);
>
> - p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>
> @@ -3678,7 +3673,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> /* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
> const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
> struct task_struct *p = current;
> - struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
> .gfp_mask = (gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask)),
> @@ -3697,8 +3691,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> */
> p->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE;
> lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
> - reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
> - p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
>
> if (zone_pagecache_reclaimable(zone) > zone->min_unmapped_pages) {
> /*
> @@ -3710,7 +3702,6 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> } while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
> }
>
> - p->reclaim_state = NULL;
> current->flags &= ~(PF_MEMALLOC | PF_SWAPWRITE);
> lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists