[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115122323.GU23965@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:23:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"juri.lelli@...il.com" <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Another SCHED_DEADLINE bug (with bisection and possible fix)
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:23:43PM +0100, Luca Abeni wrote:
> There are some parts of the patch that I do not understand (for example:
> if I understand well, if the task is not throttled you set dl_new to 1...
> And if it is throttled you change its current runtime and scheduling deadline...
> Why?)
> Anyway, I tested the patch and I confirm that it fixes the hang I originally
> reported.
I'll go look at the patch in a wee bit. But Juri, Luca, could you
describe the correct behaviour?
>From what I understand we should either modify the tasks run/sleep stats
when we change its parameters or we should schedule a delayed release of
the bandwidth delta (when it reaches its 0-lag point, if thats in the
future).
Doing neither will allow one to game the reservation system afaict.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists