lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:07:18 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix bindings document

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.m@...panasonic.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>

Perhaps some explanation. You can't just remove properties. Please
explain to what extent the old/wrong name is used. This patch is only
okay if there are no users of gpio-phandle.

Rob

> ---
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> index b9bd1d6..f7a158d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
>  ----------------------------------
>
>  A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active-
> -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed:
> +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be
> +followed:
>
>  The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the
>  GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted
> @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows:
>         numeric-gpio-range ::=
>                         <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count>
>         named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>'
> -       gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node.
> +       pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node
>         gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller
>         pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller
>         count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ