lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:26:34 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: tegra: Set spi-max-frequency property to
 flash node

On 01/15/2015 09:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> To silence a warning on Nyan boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
> index 9a9cffe..94c7ba9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-nyan-big.dts
> @@ -1660,6 +1660,7 @@
>
>   		flash@0 {
>   			compatible = "winbond,w25q32dw";
> +			spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;

This property already exists in the SPI controller. Isn't the max 
frequency supposed to inherit from there? If so, shouldn't the code not 
warn when such inheritance happens, i.e. it'd be better to fix the code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ