linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150115213256.GA4813@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:32:56 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:18:18PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> > QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable.
> 
> Looked art the qemu side for now, commenting here due to qemu patches
> not being posted to the list yet (guess that is at least partly already
> on your todo list):

Absolutely.

>  * Both legacy and modern should be switchable.  Modern needs to be
>    switchable _anyway_ for backward compatibility with old qemu
>    versions.  But legacy should be too, for testing purposes and for
>    new device types which don't need legacy in the first place.

I agree.

>  * I'd like to see some more flexibility in the pci bar layout.  Stuff
>    I have in mind:
>     - New devices which don't need a legacy bar can use bar 0 for
>       modern.
>     - One MMIO bar is enough, we can place both virtio regions and
>       msi-x regions there.  I'd suggest to add msi-x sub-regions to
>       the modern bar.

Why exactly? It seems simpler to separate things, extra BARs
have no cost.

>  * What is the reason for making the modern bar 8M in size?  Looks a bit
>    excessive, given that only 64k or so of that are actually used ...

I use a page per VQ for architectures that can locate the offset of the
accessed page that triggered EPT violation faster than the offset within
page.  I think this is the case for SVM.

> 
> virtio-scsi seems to be broken, at least my usual fedora guest didn't
> boot up from virtio-scsi disk when using a guest kernel with this patch
> series applied.
> 
> cheers,
>   Gerd

I'll re-test. Do other devices work for you? Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/