linux-kernel - Re: [vireshk:cpufreq/core/locking 57/60] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:512:5: sparse: symbol '__cpufreq_boost_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpon55ycK+BeUK4KPFuiWbZb39S_4xc9G8fDtXwM4LuGHJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:35:57 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [vireshk:cpufreq/core/locking 57/60] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:512:5:
 sparse: symbol '__cpufreq_boost_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?

On 16 January 2015 at 12:25, kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> tree:   https://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux cpufreq/core/locking
> head:   12d5339e685739289c2f629c943b8bfad4c64f1e
> commit: fbce49b78afdaeeaee3017cfbd968e44ddba8496 [57/60] cpufreq: Drop forward declaration of __cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()
> reproduce:
>   # apt-get install sparse
>   git checkout fbce49b78afdaeeaee3017cfbd968e44ddba8496
>   make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
>   make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
>
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:512:5: sparse: symbol '__cpufreq_boost_supported' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

Fixed. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/