[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B8BB24.2020408@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:17:56 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
CC: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"phoenix.liyi@...wei.com" <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-acpi <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
On 2015年01月16日 02:23, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:26:20PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
>>
>> I'll get right to the point: Can we please have this series queued up
>> for v3.20?
>
> Before you even ask for this, please look at the patches and realise
> that there is a complete lack of Reviewed-by tags on the code (well,
> apart from trivial Kconfig changes). In addition, the series touches on
> other subsystems like clocksource, irqchip, acpi and I don't see any
> acks from the corresponding maintainers. So even if I wanted to merge
For the ACPI part, Rafael already said that "Having looked at the
patches recently, I don't see any major problems in them from the ACPI
core perspective, so to me they are good to go." [1]
Is that kind of ack for this ?
Thanks
Hanjun
[1]:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1409.1/03363.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists