[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B8C49A.9070302@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:58:18 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Antoine Ténart
<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] ata: libahci: Allow using a regulator for each
port
Hi,
On 15-01-15 15:09, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The current implementation of the libahci allows using one PHY per
> port but we still have one single regulator for the whole
> controller. This series adds the support of multiple regulators.
>
> This is the forth version of the series.
>
> The improvement of this version is the use of
> ahci_platform_put_resources to put the reference to the regulators.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Grégory
Thanks, patches 1 - 3 look good and are:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Tejun, can you please queue up 1 - 3 ?
I still have some remarks wrt patch 4 (*), and it should probably go
upstream through another tree anyways.
Regards,
Hans
*) I didn't look closely at patch 4 as it seemed trivial, until now
that is ...
>
> Changelog:
>
> v3 -> v4
> - Moved putting the reference to the regulators into the
> ahci_platform_put_resources function.
> - Tested the port_dev pointer before dereferencing.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - put back the regulator inside the sub-node ports
> - made the ports platform devices when the device tree is used
> - released the regulator in case of error in the probe function
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Kept the case when no child node are present under the ahci node
> - Fix the test done under the label disable_target_pwrs
> - No more use an of_ version of the regulator framework and instead
> associate each regulator of a port with an unique name.
> - Added the acked-by on the clean-up patch
>
> Gregory CLEMENT (4):
> ata: libahci: Clean-up the ahci_platform_en/disable_phys functions
> Documentation: bindings: Add the regulator property to the sub-nodes
> AHCI bindings
> ata: libahci: Allow using multiple regulators
> ARM: mvebu: Armada 385 GP: Add regulators to the SATA port
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.txt | 9 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-388-gp.dts | 126 +++++++++++
> drivers/ata/ahci.h | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/ahci_imx.c | 14 +-
> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 236 ++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/ahci_platform.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists