[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B8E5C9.5090006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:19:53 +0100
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseries/le: Fix another endiannes issue in RTAS call
from xmon
On 16/01/2015 04:02, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:41 -0800, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> On 01/15/2015 02:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> If this was on a powerkvm guest set-indicator should be present for
>> hotplug (DLPAR) support. However, the surveillance indicator would not
>> be implemented. I know sometimes I forget if I'm on a powervm or
>> powerkvm guest. Just a thought.
>
> Right that does explain it. I went looking for the KVM kernel/qemu code that
> implements set-indicator but couldn't find it. Presumably it's in some branch
> other than the one I was looking at, or I was grepping for the wrong thing.
>
> So I guess a printf there is probably not helpful, because it will fire always
> on PowerKVM (at least at the moment).
FWIW, the PAPR mentions that the surveillance indicator may not be
implemented. In that case -3 is returned.? I double checked that on my LPAR.
One option would be to warn only if the returned value is different from
0 and -3.
Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists