[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501161122320.5526@nanos>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:23:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> There is no point in calling suspend/resume for unused
> clocksources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index 920a4da58eb0..baea4e42ae90 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ void clocksource_suspend(void)
> struct clocksource *cs;
>
> list_for_each_entry_reverse(cs, &clocksource_list, list)
> - if (cs->suspend)
> + if (cs->suspend && (cs->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_USED))
> cs->suspend(cs);
This might be dangerous. If the clocksource has no enable/disable
callbacks, but suspend/resume, then you might leave it enabled across
suspend.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists