[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+H2tpGPKc8Gu=s+d4PnO=Wp_Uv=o338hxj_1opPRkZ3KZH+rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:49:20 +0800
From: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
"florian.vaussard@...l.ch" <florian.vaussard@...l.ch>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"rrichter@...ium.com" <rrichter@...ium.com>,
"hytszk@...il.com" <hytszk@...il.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"antonynpavlov@...il.com" <antonynpavlov@...il.com>,
"Joel.Schopp@....com" <Joel.Schopp@....com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org" <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"geng.ren@...eadtrum.com" <geng.ren@...eadtrum.com>,
"zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com" <zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
"lanqing.liu@...eadtrum.com" <lanqing.liu@...eadtrum.com>,
"zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
"wei.qiao@...eadtrum.com" <wei.qiao@...eadtrum.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: Add support for Spreadtrum SC9836 SoC
in dts and Makefile
Hi, Mark,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:00:09AM +0000, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> From: Zhizhou Zhang <zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com>
>>
>> Adds the device tree support for Spreadtrum SC9836 SoC which is based on
>> Sharkl64 platform.
>>
>> Sharkl64 platform contains the common nodes of Spreadtrum's arm64-based SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhizhou Zhang <zhizhou.zhang@...eadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile | 5 ++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9836-openphone.dts | 49 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9836.dtsi | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sharkl64.dtsi | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9836-openphone.dts
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9836.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sharkl64.dtsi
>
> [...]
>
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + cpu@0 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu@1 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x1>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu@2 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x2>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu@3 {
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53", "arm,armv8";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x3>;
>> + enable-method = "psci";
>> + };
>> + };
>
> Just to check, all CPUs may be hotplugged off and on, yes?
>
Yes, I have tested with them successfully by looking into
`/proc/interrupts` and `top` except CPU0.
> Including CPU0?
>
It returns "status busy" after I type the command below.
> How is your implementation tested?
>
I build kernel image with 3.19-rc1 + this patchset and run into console.
I use `echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu[0-3]/online`
BTW, I run these on a real phone of sc9836 not fast-model as before.
> You boot CPUs at EL2?
>
Yes, I have confirmed this when working around the BUG() in
arch_counter_get_cntpct() introduced from 3.19.
>> +
>> + gic: interrupt-controller@...01000 {
>> + compatible = "arm,gic-400";
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + reg = <0 0x12001000 0 0x1000>,
>> + <0 0x12002000 0 0x2000>,
>> + <0 0x12004000 0 0x2000>,
>> + <0 0x12006000 0 0x2000>;
>> + };
>
> You're missing the maintenance interrupt here.
>
Do you mean to declare SGI like this ?
" interrupts = <1 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)> "
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sharkl64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sharkl64.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b08989d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sharkl64.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Spreadtrum Sharkl64 platform DTS file
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014, Spreadtrum Communications Inc.
>> + *
>> + * This file is licensed under a dual GPLv2 or X11 license.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> + soc {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
>
> What is this reg for? It's not required by simple-bus.
>
It's added by me.
I want to tell people the register range of what the bus covers, not
for any drivers use.
for this example, It starts from address 0 to 0x80000000.
Because Spreadtrum chip is very large with a lots of registers and matrix buses.
> If you want to encode that this covers a particular portion of the
> address space, do so with the ranges proeprty.
But I look up the ePAPER who says "The ranges property provides a
means of defining a mapping or translation...".
The bus here is flat-memory for all.
>
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges;
>> +
>> + ap_apb: apb@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x70000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
>
> Likewise here.
>
This initial patch is picked up from a very big dt file.
There are several apb buses in this chip.
So I use apb@...rting-address to separate them.
But I remember another rule that the @address needs to equal first
address in property reg array.
Do I have to delete @7000000 as well if i delete reg line?
Orson
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists