lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150116160730.GY7091@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:07:30 +0000
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
	"yexl@...vell.com" <yexl@...vell.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Consolidate hotplug notifier for instruction
 emulation

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:36:05PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> 
> As of now each insn_emulation has a cpu hotplug notifier that
> enables/disables the CPU feature bit for the functionality. This
> patch re-arranges the code, such that there is only one notifier
> that runs through the list of registered emulation hooks and runs
> their corresponding set_hw_mode.
> 
> We do nothing when a CPU is dying as we will set the appropriate bits
> as it comes back online based on the state of the hooks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt |    4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |    2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c        |  113 +++++++++++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> index a3b3da2..0a4dc26 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ behaviours and the corresponding values of the sysctl nodes -
>    instructions. Using hardware execution generally provides better
>    performance, but at the loss of ability to gather runtime statistics
>    about the use of the deprecated instructions.
> +  Note: Emulation of a deprecated instruction depends on the availability
> +  of the feature on all the active CPUs. In case of CPU hotplug, if a new
> +  CPU doesn't support a feature, it could result in the abortion of the
> +  hotplug operation.

Is this true? We should be able to *emulate* the instruction anywhere,
it's the "hardware execution" setting that needs CPU support.

>  The default mode depends on the status of the instruction in the
>  architecture. Deprecated instructions should default to emulation
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index c7f68d1..a56b45f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEndEL0	(0x1UL << 16)
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEnd		(0x1UL << 8)
>  
> +#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN 	(1 << 5)
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
>  extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> index c363671..be64218 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  #include <asm/traps.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include "trace-events-emulation.h"
> @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct insn_emulation_ops {
>  	const char		*name;
>  	enum legacy_insn_status	status;
>  	struct undef_hook	*hooks;
> -	int			(*set_hw_mode)(bool enable);
> +	int			(*set_hw_mode)(void *enable);

I think it would be cleaner to have a wrapper for the on_each_cpu
variant of this, otherwise we lose the type information altogether.

>  };
>  
>  struct insn_emulation {
> @@ -85,6 +86,40 @@ static void remove_emulation_hooks(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	pr_notice("Removed %s emulation handler\n", ops->name);
>  }
>  
> +/* Run set_hw_mode(mode) on all active CPUs */
> +static int run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn, bool enable)
> +{
> +	void (*set_hw_mode)(void *) = (void (*) (void *))insn->ops->set_hw_mode;
> +	if (!set_hw_mode)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	on_each_cpu(set_hw_mode, (void *)enable, true);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Run set_hw_mode for all insns on a starting CPU.
> + * Returns:
> + *  0 		- If all the hooks ran successfully.
> + * -EINVAL	- At least one hook is not supported by the CPU.
> + *		  abort the hotplug.
> + */
> +static int run_all_insn_set_hw_mode(void)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct insn_emulation *insn;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &insn_emulation, node) {
> +		bool hw_mode = (insn->current_mode == INSN_HW);
> +		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode &&
> +			insn->ops->set_hw_mode((void*)hw_mode))
> +			rc = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  				       enum insn_emulation_mode prev)
>  {
> @@ -97,10 +132,8 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		remove_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode) {
> -			insn->ops->set_hw_mode(false);
> +		if (!run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false))
>  			pr_notice("Disabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -111,10 +144,9 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		register_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode && insn->ops->set_hw_mode(true))
> +		ret = run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, true);
> +		if (!ret)
>  			pr_notice("Enabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		else
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -133,6 +165,8 @@ static void register_insn_emulation(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	switch (ops->status) {
>  	case INSN_DEPRECATED:
>  		insn->current_mode = INSN_EMULATE;
> +		/* Disable the HW mode if it was turned on at early boot time */
> +		run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false);
>  		insn->max = INSN_HW;
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_OBSOLETE:
> @@ -453,8 +487,6 @@ ret:
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN (1 << 5)
> -
>  static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
> @@ -465,48 +497,13 @@ static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  	asm volatile("msr sctlr_el1, %0" : : "r" (val));
>  }
>  
> -static void enable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> -{
> -	config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> -}
> -
> -static void disable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> +static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(void *enable)
>  {
> -	config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static int cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> -			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> -{
> -	switch (action) {
> -	case CPU_STARTING:
> -	case CPU_STARTING_FROZEN:
> -		enable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	case CPU_DYING:
> -	case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
> -		disable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return NOTIFY_OK;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block cpu_hotplug_notifier = {
> -	.notifier_call = cpu_hotplug_notify,
> -};
> -
> -static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(bool enable)
> -{
> -	if (enable) {
> -		register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(enable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	} else {
> -		unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(disable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> +	if (enable)
> +		config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> +	else
> +		config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static struct undef_hook cp15_barrier_hooks[] = {
> @@ -534,6 +531,21 @@ static struct insn_emulation_ops cp15_barrier_ops = {
>  	.set_hw_mode = cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode,
>  };
>  
> +static int insn_cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> +			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	if ((action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) == CPU_STARTING)
> +		rc = run_all_insn_set_hw_mode();
> +
> +	/* Abort the CPU hotplug if there is an incompatibility */
> +	return notifier_from_errno(rc);

Could we restrict the emulation options instead and just disable hardware
support for the instruction?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ