lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150116221824.GA512@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:18:24 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	daniel@...que.org, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
	tixxdz@...ndz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Add kdbus implementation

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 05:07:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This can also be found in a git tree, the kdbus branch of char-misc.git at:
> >         https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/
> 
> Is this now the canonical tree?  I ask because the github tree hasn't
> been updated in quite some time.

That's my fault, it's just a mirror of the code.google.com tree for
people who like to use github.  It's now updated.

> The code.google.com tree has commits
> from 2 days ago, but it still calls d_materialise_unique in fs.c
> whereas the patchset you've posted uses the correct d_splice_alias.
> So the code.google.com tree doesn't actually compile against 3.19-rcX.
> 
> I'm confused where we're supposed to track things now.

I think the google tree is the "correct" one, but when generating
patches, apis are tweaked to work properly with the latest -rc kernel
for submission.

Daniel knows more though, he's the one generating the patchsets, I don't
know how he's doing it exactly.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ