linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmscan: fix the page state calculation in too_many

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:48:18 +0530
From:	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmscan: fix the page state calculation in too_many_isolated

On 01/16/2015 09:19 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 15-01-15 22:54:20, Vinayak Menon wrote:
>> On 01/14/2015 10:20 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 14-01-15 17:06:59, Vinayak Menon wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> In one such instance, zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE)
>>>> had returned 14, zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
>>>> returned 92, and GFP_IOFS was set, and this resulted
>>>> in too_many_isolated returning true. But one of the CPU's
>>>> pageset vm_stat_diff had NR_ISOLATED_FILE as "-14". So the
>>>> actual isolated count was zero. As there weren't any more
>>>> updates to NR_ISOLATED_FILE and vmstat_update deffered work
>>>> had not been scheduled yet, 7 tasks were spinning in the
>>>> congestion wait loop for around 4 seconds, in the direct
>>>> reclaim path.
>>>
>>> Not syncing for such a long time doesn't sound right. I am not familiar
>>> with the vmstat syncing but sysctl_stat_interval is HZ so it should
>>> happen much more often that every 4 seconds.
>>>
>>
>> Though the interval is HZ, since the vmstat_work is declared as a
>> deferrable work, IIUC the timer trigger can be deferred to the next
>> non-defferable timer expiry on the CPU which is in idle. This results
>> in the vmstat syncing on an idle CPU delayed by seconds. May be in
>> most cases this behavior is fine, except in cases like this.
>
> I am not sure I understand the above because CPU being idle doesn't
> seem important AFAICS. Anyway I have checked the current code which has
> changed quite recently by 7cc36bbddde5 (vmstat: on-demand vmstat workers
> V8). Let's CC Christoph (the thread starts here:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/127229).
>

I will try to explain the exact observations. All the cases which I had 
encountered, had similar symptoms. In one of the cases, it was CPU3 
alone which had not updated the vmstat_diff. This CPU was in idle for 
around 30 secs. When I looked at the tvec base for this CPU, the timer 
associated with vmstat_update had its expiry time less than current 
jiffies. This timer had its deferrable flag set, and was tied to the 
next non-deferrable timer in the list. Since deferrable timers can't 
wake up the CPU, the vmstat sync for this CPU was deferred for a long 
time i.e. till the expiry of next non-deferrable timer. The issue was 
caught because, one of the tasks which was in reclaim path and in the 
congestion_wait loop had an associated watchdog, which resulted in a 
panic after 4secs. So 4 secs is actually the watchdog expiry, and the 
time we can get blocked in the congestion loop can be even more.



-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/