linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150117224905.GA6847@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:49:05 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>
Cc:	forest@...ttletooquiet.net, tvboxspy@...il.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or
 return

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 04:12:58AM +1100, Emrys Bayliss wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
> rxtx.c:558: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>
> ---
> The else statement was replaced with a block to avoid the following
> compiler error:
> "warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code"
> due to this declaration:
> struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g; (line 559)
> 
> Is there a better way such as using head (a union) directly instead?
> 
> The last patch I sent removed the return 0. Since this isn't related to
> the error in the title I left it for a separate patch.
> 
>  drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> index ea5140a..831a051 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
>  		memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>  
>  		return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
> -	} else {
> +	}
> +
> +	{
>  		struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
>  		/* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
>  		vnt_get_phy_field(priv, cts_frame_len,

As I said before, this is not correct, please fix it up properly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/