[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150117232827.GA17007@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:28:27 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tristan Lelong <tristan@...ong.xyz>
Cc: oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com, askb23@...il.com,
john.hammond@...el.com, gdonald@...il.com, anhlq2110@...il.com,
fabio.falzoi84@...il.com, oort10@...il.com, agimenez@...valve.es,
rupran@...server.de, surya.seetharaman9@...il.com,
Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, joe@...ches.com, a.terekhov@...il.com,
liang.zhen@...el.com, vthakkar1994@...il.com, amk@...y.com,
srikrishanmalik@...il.com, rd@...ekdostal.com, bergwolf@...il.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
tapaswenipathak@...il.com, email@...istophjaeger.info,
uja.ornl@...il.com, brilliantov@...ox.ru, dmitry.eremin@...el.com,
HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning on LPROC_SEQ_FOPS
macros
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:03:22PM -0800, Tristan Lelong wrote:
> This patch fix a sparse warning in lustre sources
>
> warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
> expected void [noderef] <asn:1>*to
> got char *<noident>
>
> This is done by adding the missing __user attribute on userland pointers inside the LPROC_SEQ_FOPS like macros:
> - LPROC_SEQ_FOPS
> - LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_RW_TYPE
> - LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_WR_ONLY
> - LDLM_POOL_PROC_WRITER
>
> The patch also updates all the functions that are used by this macro:
> - lprocfs_wr_*
> - *_seq_write
>
> as well as some helpers used by the previously modified functions (otherwise fixing the sparse warning add some new ones):
> - lprocfs_write_frac_helper
> - lprocfs_write_helper
> - lprocfs_write_u64_helper
>
> The patch also fixes one __user pointer direct dereference by strncmp in function fld_proc_hash_seq_write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Lelong <tristan@...ong.xyz>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> Use dynamic allocation for 'name' variable instead of having it on the stack, per Greg K-H suggestion.
>
> Changes in v3:
> Rename added variable from 'name' to 'fh_name'.
> Revert to a stack declaration of 'fh_name' since it is not 80 bytes but only 8, per Andreas Dilger comment.
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/lproc_fld.c | 14 ++++--
> .../staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h | 44 +++++++++--------
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h | 5 +-
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c | 7 +--
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lproc_lov.c | 20 +++++---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/lproc_mdc.c | 7 +--
> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c | 5 +-
> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 2 +-
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c | 57 +++++++++++++---------
> .../staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/lproc_ptlrpc.c | 25 +++++-----
> 11 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
I took your v2 version, please send me the difference as this is a
mess...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists