[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54BB795C.6040402@broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:14:04 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: iproc: Add Broadcom iProc I2C Driver
On 01/17/15 00:42, Ray Jui wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * Can be expanded in the future if more interrupt status bits are utilized
> + */
> +#define ISR_MASK (1<< IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)
> +
> +static irqreturn_t bcm_iproc_i2c_isr(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct bcm_iproc_i2c_dev *iproc_i2c = data;
> + u32 status = readl(iproc_i2c->base + IS_OFFSET);
> +
> + status&= ISR_MASK;
> +
> + if (!status)
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + writel(status, iproc_i2c->base + IS_OFFSET);
> + complete_all(&iproc_i2c->done);
Looking over this code it seems to me there is always a single process
waiting for iproc_i2c->done to complete. So using complete() here would
suffice.
Regards,
Arend
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists