[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150118092955.GE6182@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 09:29:56 +0000
From: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"wangyijing@...wei.com" <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
"phoenix.liyi@...wei.com" <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on
ARM64
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:46:35PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年01月18日 14:31, Jon Masters wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likely do
> > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded. That
> said,
> >if we booted a previously built kernel on a system without an MCFG and
> > got no ECAM/root then things would probably still work.
> >
> >I think it'll work out either way but for the record there is no requirement to do PCIe on ARM servers that conform to spec.
>
> OK, Catalin already said that was not the main point of the
> comments for this patch, I think the title and change log
> of the patch is inconsistent with the code makes Catalin confused,
> I will update them in next version.
>
Well what we are talking about is the presence of CONFIG_PCI=y which even
in Jons case will be true as he wants to run the same kernel on both
sets of hardware.
Now the architecture has PCI support I think its safe to remove the make
PCI optional part of the patch as this should be handled runtime not
compile time.
Graeme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists