[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150119074138.GN3574@x1>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:41:38 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: 敬锐 <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
Cc: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"rogerable@...ltek.com" <rogerable@...ltek.com>,
王炜 <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts525A
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, 敬锐 wrote:
>
> On 01/18/2015 07:13 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void rts5249_force_power_down(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, u8 pm_state)
> >> > rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, AUTOLOAD_CFG_BASE + 3, 0x01, 0);
> >> >
> >> > if (pm_state == HOST_ENTER_S3) {
> >> >- if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A)
> >> >+ if (PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x524A || PCI_PID(pcr) == 0x525A)
> > Shouldn't these be defined somewhere?
> >
> > I have a particular distaste for magic numbers.
> >
> This is the chip ID number, no need define, just using it.
> if we define, it will like RTS525A_PCI_ID, so bad.
Looks good. Please do that.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists