[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANFwon2XjhErx9uoZMJD1x=C4qEbrM6+2otnhNtQ-1duCebSFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:04:42 +0800
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mgorman@...e.de,
hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
sasha.levin@...cle.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Fix race conditions on getting migratetype
in buffered_rmqueue
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> On 18.1.2015 10:17, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> From: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
>>
>> To test the patch [1], I use KGTP and a script [2] to show
>> NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES
>> and gross of cma_nr_free. The values are always not same.
>> I check the code of pages alloc and free and found that race conditions
>> on getting migratetype in buffered_rmqueue.
>
>
> Can you elaborate? What does this races with, are you dynamically changing
> the size of CMA area, or what? The migratetype here is based on which free
> list the page was found on. Was it misplaced then? Wasn't Joonsoo's recent
> series supposed to eliminate this?
My bad.
I thought move_freepages has race condition with this part. But I
missed it will check PageBuddy before set_freepage_migratetype.
Sorry for that.
I will do more work around this one and [1].
Thanks for your review.
Best,
Hui
>
>> Then I add move the code of getting migratetype inside the zone->lock
>> protection part.
>
>
> Not just that, you are also reading migratetype from pageblock bitmap
> instead of the one embedded in the free page. Which is more expensive
> and we already do that more often than we would like to because of CMA.
> And it appears to be a wrong fix for a possible misplacement bug. If there's
> such misplacement, the wrong stats are not the only problem.
>
>>
>> Because this issue will affect system even if the Linux kernel does't
>> have [1]. So I post this patch separately.
>
>
> But we can't test that without [1], right? Maybe the issue is introduced by
> [1]?
>
>
>>
>> This patchset is based on fc7f0dd381720ea5ee5818645f7d0e9dece41cb0.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/18/28
>> [2] https://github.com/teawater/kgtp/blob/dev/add-ons/cma_free.py
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 11 +++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 7633c50..f3d6922 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -1694,11 +1694,12 @@ again:
>> }
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
>> page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
>> + if (page)
>> + migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
>> + else
>> + goto failed_unlock;
>> spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
>> - if (!page)
>> - goto failed;
>> - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order),
>> - get_freepage_migratetype(page));
>> + __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -(1 << order),
>> migratetype);
>> }
>> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ALLOC_BATCH, -(1 << order));
>> @@ -1715,6 +1716,8 @@ again:
>> goto again;
>> return page;
>> +failed_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
>> failed:
>> local_irq_restore(flags);
>> return NULL;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists